Title: 6SA Scores Example 3

Q: #1 Introduction

1. The introduction clearly states the topic of the argument.
Can you answer: What is the argument about?

2. The introduction attracts the reader’s attention in the context of the case.
Can you answer, assuming the role of the recipient in the case: Why should I read this?
- 2 points: I can answer with YES on the first and the second question, hence both criteria are fulfilled (correct)
- 0 points: I cannot answer with YES on the first question, hence the first criterion is NOT fulfilled
- 1 point: I can answer with YES on the first question, and with NO on the second question, hence only the first criterion is fulfilled

Q: #2 Position

1. The position fits the argument’s introduction (#1)
Is this a position that applies to the decision situation established in the introduction? (#1)

2. The position explicitly identifies the actors and objects in the context of the case.
Is it clear who is supposed to do what?
- 1 point: I can answer with YES on the first question, and with NO on the second question, hence only the first criterion is fulfilled (correct)
- 0 points: I cannot answer with YES on the first question, hence the first criterion is NOT fulfilled
- 2 points: I can answer with YES on the first and the second question, hence both criteria are fulfilled

Q: #3 Reason

1. The reason explains why the position (#2) is a good choice.
Do you understand why someone might take this position?

2. The reason is plausible in the context of the case.
Do you accept this reason? If not, why not?
- 0 points: I cannot answer with YES on the first question, hence the first criterion is NOT fulfilled (correct)
- 1 point: I can answer with YES on the first question, and with NO on the second question, hence only the first criterion is fulfilled
- 2 points: I can answer with YES on the first and the second question, hence both criteria are fulfilled

Q: #4 Challenge

1. The challenge articulates one point of criticism concerning the reason (#3).
Does the anticipated criticism really apply to the supportive reason?

2. The challenge identifies a central weakness of the reason that is plausible in the context of the case.
Do you accept this as a central point of criticism? If not, which other, more important challenge would you suggest?
- 0 points: I cannot answer with YES on the first question, hence the first criterion is NOT fulfilled (correct)
- 1 point: I can answer with YES on the first question, and with NO on the second question, hence only the first criterion is fulfilled
- 2 points: I can answer with YES on the first and the second question, hence both criteria are fulfilled

Q: #5 Rebuttal

1. The rebuttal states a response that refutes or qualifies the challenge (#4).
Does the rebuttal apply to the challenge?

2. The rebuttal is plausible in the context of the case.
Do you accept the rebuttal as sufficient to dismiss the criticism (#4)? If not, why not?
- 0 points: I cannot answer with YES on the first question, hence the first criterion is NOT fulfilled (correct)
- 1 point: I can answer with YES on the first question, and with NO on the second question, hence only the first criterion is fulfilled
- 2 points: I can answer with YES on the first and the second question, hence both criteria are fulfilled

Q: #6 Conclusion

1. Summarizes the argument on the basis of previously presented information (#1–#5).
Does the conclusion avoid introducing new arguments or information?

2. The conclusion reinforces the position and emphasizes its relevance in the context of the case.
Do you feel that the conclusion motivates you to follow the author’s advice?
- 2 points: I can answer with YES on the first and the second question, hence both criteria are fulfilled (correct)
- 0 points: I cannot answer with YES on the first question, hence the first criterion is NOT fulfilled
- 1 point: I can answer with YES on the first question, and with NO on the second question, hence only the first criterion is fulfilled

Feedback (0 to 20%): Bad Score. Read the 6SA grading criteria again.
Feedback (21 to 40%): Bad Score. Re-Read the case, the writing assignment, and the 6Sa carefully.
Feedback (41 to 60%): Average Score. Strive to become a more critical reader.
Feedback (61 to 100%): Great Score! Excellent Assessment.